主办：陕西省汽车工程学会
ISSN 1671-7988  CN 61-1394/TH
创刊：1976年
Automobile Applied Technology

Automobile Applied Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12): 101-106.DOI: 10.16638/j.cnki.1671-7988.2022.012.021

• Testing and Experiment • Previous Articles    

Comparisons of Two Test Methods for Energy Consumption and Driving Range of Light-duty Vehicles

MA Zhicheng, DU Yang, YANG Fan, ZHANG Luowei   

  1. CATARC Automotive Test Center (Tianjin) Company Limited,
  • Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-06-30
  • Contact: MA Zhicheng

两种轻型汽车能耗及续驶里程试验方法对比

马志成，杜 阳，杨 帆，张罗伟   

  1. 中汽研汽车检验中心（天津）有限公司
  • 通讯作者: 马志成
  • 作者简介:马志成（1988—），男，硕士，工程师，研究方向为轻型车排放、油耗、能耗等测试，E-mail：mazhicheng @catarc.ac.cn。

PDF

Abstract: This article compares and analyzes the test methods of GB/T 19753—2013 and GB/T 19753—2021 for the energy consumption of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) from the aspects of test conditions, test process and calculation methods, as well as GB/T 18386—2017 and GB/T 18386.1—2021 two kinds of blade electric vehicles (BEV) energy consumption and driving range test methods. 5 light-duty plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and 5 light-duty pure electric vehicles were tested respectively, and the changes in driving range, energy consumption and weighted fuel consumption were compared and analyzed. The effects of switching test methods on the test results of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and pure electric vehicles are summarized.

Key words: Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles; Blade electric vehicles; Driving range; Energy consumption; Test methods

摘要： 从试验工况、试验过程、计算方法等方面对比分析了 GB/T 19753—2013 和 GB/T 19753—2021 两种插电式混合动力汽车能量消耗量试验方法，以及 GB/T 18386—2017 和 GB/T 18386.1—2021 两种纯电动汽车能量消耗量和续驶里程试验方法。并分别对 5 辆轻型插电式混 合动力汽车及 5 辆轻型纯电动汽车进行测试，对比分析了续驶里程、能量消耗量以及加权油 耗的变化，总结了切换试验方法对插电式混合动力汽车及纯电动汽车测试结果的影响。

关键词: 插电式混合动力汽车；纯电动汽车；续驶里程；能量消耗量；试验方法