主办:陕西省汽车工程学会
ISSN 1671-7988  CN 61-1394/TH
创刊:1976年

汽车实用技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 113-117.DOI: 10.16638/j.cnki.1671-7988.2026.003.020

• 汽车教育 • 上一篇    

基于工程认证体系的汽车电器与电子技术 多元指标考核体系改革

李直,秦园,魏娜莎   

  1. 太原科技大学 车辆与交通工程学院
  • 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 李直
  • 作者简介:李直(1988-),男,博士,副教授,研究方向为车辆零部件摩擦学设计
  • 基金资助:
    山西省高等学校教学改革创新项目:车辆工程专业课程多元指标考核体系改革(J20241016);“智慧交通” 背景下思政科教融合的教学探索与实践-以“结构设计原理”课程为例(J20241002);太原科技大学教学 改革创新研究项目“车辆工程专业课程多元指标考核体系改革”(JGB2024083);新工科背景下基于 OBE 理 念车辆工程分析技术课程教学改革与实践(JG2023088)

Reform of Multi-Index Assessment System for Automobile Electrical Equipment and Electronic Technology Based on Engineering Certification System

LI Zhi, QIN Yuan, WEI Nasha   

  1. School of Vehicle and Transportation Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology
  • Published:2026-02-04
  • Contact: LI Zhi

摘要: 随着工程教育认证对“学生中心、成果导向、持续改进”理念的深化,传统以试卷考 试为主的课程考核模式已难以满足车辆工程专业复合型人才培养需求。文章以工程认证的毕 业要求为基准,构建涵盖知识、能力、素质的多元指标考核体系,提出课程目标与考核指标 动态映射模型,并通过太原科技大学车辆工程专业汽车电器与电子技术课程的实践案例验证 其有效性。改革后,学生工程实践能力得到了提升,课程目标与毕业要求关联度更高,学生的 课程成绩均分从 84.57 分提升到 88.08 分,毕业就业率提升了 16.24%,取得了良好的效果, 为同类专业课考核体系改革提供了参考。

关键词: 工程教育认证;车辆工程;多元考核;持续改进

Abstract: With the deepening of the concept of "student-centered, outcome oriented, and continuous improvement" in engineering education certification, the traditional course assessment model based on paper exams is no longer able to meet the needs of cultivating composite talents in the field of vehicle engineering. This paper takes the graduation requirements of engineering certification as the benchmark, constructs a multi-dimensional indicator assessment system covering knowledge, ability, and quality, proposes a dynamic mapping model between course objectives and assessment indicators, and the effectiveness of the course is verified by the practical case of Automotive Electrical and Electronic Technology in the vehicle engineering major of Taiyuan University of Science and Technology. After the reform, students' engineering practice ability has been improved, and the correlation between course objectives and graduation requirements has become higher. The average score of students' courses has increased from 84.57 to 88.08, and the graduation employment rate has increased by 16.24%, achieving good results and providing reference for the reform of the assessment system of similar professional courses.

Key words: engineering education certification; vehicle engineering; diversified assessment; continuous improvement