主办：陕西省汽车工程学会
ISSN 1671-7988  CN 61-1394/TH
创刊：1976年
汽车实用技术

汽车实用技术 ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (23): 169-175.DOI: 10.16638/j.cnki.1671-7988.2022.023.031

• 测试试验 • 上一篇    

基于 2018 版 C-NCAP 评价结果的汽车安全 技术分析

刘 鹏，李向荣，周博雅，张云龙   

  1. 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司
  • 出版日期:2022-12-15 发布日期:2022-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘 鹏
  • 作者简介:刘鹏（1992—），男，硕士，工程师，研究方向为汽车性能测试评价，E-mail:liupeng@catarc.ac.cn。

Analysis of Automobile Safety Technology Based on C-NCAP (2018 Edition)

LIU Peng, LI Xiangrong, ZHOU Boya, ZHANG Yunlong   

  1. China Automotive Technology Research Center Company Limited
  • Online:2022-12-15 Published:2022-12-15
  • Contact: LIU Peng

PDF

摘要： 自 2018 年 7 月至 2021 年 12 月，2018 版中国新车评价规程（C-NCAP）已正式完成了 102 款车型的测试评价，论文以这 102 款车型的评价结果作为研究对象，统计分析了在不同 试验形态下不同类型车型的主、被动安全表现，结合自 2006 年至 2021 年不同版本的中国新 车评价规程评价结果，通过对比，定量分析了自主品牌与合资品牌的安全性能差距变化趋势， 同时分析了电动汽车与传统燃油车以及不同级别车型的安全性能差异，为汽车安全试验相关 工作提供了重要数据参考。

关键词: 中国新车评价规程；碰撞试验；汽车安全；测试评价；定量分析

Abstract: From July 2018 to the end of 2021, the china-new car assessment programme has completed the formal evaluation of 102 models. Taking the evaluation results of these 102 models as the research object, this paper statistically analyzes the active and passive safety performance of different types of models under different test forms. Combined with the evaluation results of China-new car assessment programme over the past 15 years, this paper quantitatively analyzes the safety performance gap between independent brands and joint venture brands through comparison. At the same time, the safety performance differences between electric vehicles and traditional fuel vehicles, as well as between new forces of vehicle manufacturing and traditional main engine manufacturers are analyzed, which provides important data support for the work related to vehicle safety test.

Key words: China-new car assessment programme; Crash test; Automobile safety; Formal evaluation; Quantitative analysis