主办:陕西省汽车工程学会
ISSN 1671-7988  CN 61-1394/TH
创刊:1976年

汽车实用技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1-7,61.DOI: 10.16638/j.cnki.1671-7988.2026.006.001

• 自驾感知决策与控制 •    

基于混合逻辑动态模型的车辆控制策略

杨洪越,陈焕明*,刘翱翔,王博文,刘申康   

  1. 青岛大学 机电工程学院
  • 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 陈焕明
  • 作者简介:杨洪越(2002-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为车辆系统动力学仿真与控制 通信作者:陈焕明(1978-),男,博士,副教授,研究方向为车辆系统动力学仿真与控制

Control Strategy for Intelligent Vehicles Based on Hybrid Logic Dynamic Model

YANG Hongyue, CHEN Huanming* , LIU Aoxiang, WANG Bowen, LIU Shenkang   

  1. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Qingdao University
  • Published:2026-03-24
  • Contact: CHEN Huanming

摘要: 为提高智能汽车横向控制在不同工况下的精度与适应性,提出一种基于混合逻辑动态 (MLD)模型的混合模型预测控制(HMPC)策略。文章基于分段仿射方法建立动力学模型, 结合二自由度车辆动力学模型,通过混杂系统描述语言(HYSDEL)构建系统的混合逻辑动 态模型。在此基础上设计 HMPC 控制器,将跟踪控制问题转化为混合整数二次规划问题进行 求解,并在 MATLAB/Simulink 与 CarSim 联合仿真平台上进行双移线工况试验。结果表明, 所设计的混杂模型预测控制器在系统呈现强非线性时仍能稳定跟踪参考轨迹,尤其在低附着 路面条件下,与传统模型预测控制(MPC)相比,HMPC 策略使横摆角速度均方根误差由 1.56 rad·s -1 降至 0.88 rad·s -1,降幅约 43.6%;横向速度均方根误差由 1.43 m·s -1降至 0.65 m·s -1, 降幅约 54.5%。控制器在强非线性条件下仍能稳定跟踪参考轨迹,有效抑制横摆与侧向速度 波动,提升复杂工况下的操纵稳定性与跟踪精度。

关键词: 智能汽车;操纵稳定性;混合逻辑动态模型;HMPC

Abstract: To improve the accuracy and adaptability of lateral control for intelligent vehicles under different working conditions, a hybrid model predictive control (HMPC) strategy based on the mixed logical dynamical (MLD) model is proposed. The dynamics model is established using the piecewise affine approach, integrated with a two-degree-of-freedom vehicle dynamics model, and the hybrid logic dynamic model of the system is constructed via the hybrid systems description language (HYSDEL). On this basis, an HMPC controller is designed, which transforms the tracking control problem into a mixed integer quadratic programming problem for solution. Simulations are conducted on a co-simulation platform combining MATLAB/Simulink and CarSim under doublelane-change conditions. The results show that the designed hybrid model predictive controller can stably track the reference trajectory even when the system exhibits strong nonlinearity. Especially under low-adhesion road conditions, compared with the conventional model predictive control (MPC), the HMPC strategy reduces the root mean square error of the yaw rate from 1.56 rad·s -1 to 0.88 rad·s -1 , a decrease of about 43.6%, and reduces the root mean square error of the lateral speed from 1.43 m·s -1 to 0.65 m·s -1 , a decrease of about 54.5%. The controller maintains stable tracking under strongly nonlinear conditions, effectively suppresses yaw and lateral speed fluctuations, and enhances handling stability and tracking accuracy in complex working conditions.

Key words: intelligent vehicle; handling stability; mixed logical dynamical model; HMPC